Towards a European
Policy Framework for Geographic Information
A WORKING DOCUMENT - November 1996
A European policy for geographic information is needed by the European
information society. The policy will contribute to providing
better and more efficient government, more effective management
of scarce resources, and new business opportunities. The policy
is necessary to ensure important cross-border initiatives are
nurtured and managed cost-effectively.
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1. The political context
2. Why geographic information is more important than ever
before
3. The opportunities - and challenges - for Europe
4. A strategy to remove bottlenecks and grasp
opportunities
5. Practical actions to be undertaken
A. Creating a Favourable Business Environment and Improving
the functioning of the Internal Market.
- Improved European cooperation and coordination
- Stimulate the creation of base data
- Stimulate the creation of metadata services
- Lowering legal barriers and reducing potential risks
B. Specific Actions
- Stimulating Public/Private synergy
- Market Stimulation
- Research and Development.
- Standards, Interoperability and Quality.
- Awareness, Education and training
- Improving our understanding of the market
- Defining Global Rules
- Conclusion
Appendix Geographic information - technical description
Executive Summary
This communication explains what geographic information is and why it is
important for Europe to have a European policy framework for geographic
information under which the market for European geographic information content
can develop and prosper.
What is so important about geographic information content that we need to
take affirmative action at European level?
A major flood occurs for the third consecutive year on a major European waterway,
hundreds of towns and villages are devastated, thousands of farms are inundated,
the damage is estimated to run into billions of ECU and will take years to
rectify. Not all of the damage can be repaired - loss of life was
mercifully small.
Surely cross-border, regional flood control and civil protection systems
can already cope?
Your morning paper brings appalling news which will directly impact you,
your family, your friends, your business and perhaps even your national economy
- "Chernobyl 2" has happened. Civil protection forces, environmental groups,
agricultural and fisheries departments, hospitals and medical associations
- everyone is asking the same questions. When will the fallout arrive? How
bad is the situation? How long will it take us to recover? How much economic
damage can be expected? How many people will die?
Yet this has happened before, so one expects that emergency services, analytical
teams, disaster relief organisations and the like are all well prepared.
But can they exchange information quickly and efficiently to enable cooperation?
Less dramatic, but still important, how does an international distributor
of goods develop a hundred million ECU regional plan for placing a series
of major goods outlets in the most appropriate locations, a project spanning
the next decade, with major direct and indirect impact on employment, on
transport infrastructure and on environmental issues? Or what about the proposal
for a new dam on a river which controls a watershed covering millions of
hectares, touching several national boundaries; or the plan for that next
industrial complex, to be built near a convenient port - which also happens
to lie in an estuary of special environmental importance.
What these scenarios all have in common is - the need for cross border geographic
information. The sort of information needed to manage the European integration,
trans European networks or smaller cross border infrastructure projects,
business development, marketing, prepare for and clean-up after major disasters,
to manage today's road traffic chaos, or to plan for the next
century's land use at local, national and regional level, is European
geographic information content.
Such information, in the form of paper maps showing locations, boundaries
and relationships, has been instrumental over the past centuries in the
development of the nation state. First it was an essential aid to territorial
conquest, the exercise of territorial sovereignty and defence. Subsequently
it has been used for governing and managing territory in times of peace.
Today, and even more so in the future, it will be the key to planning for
optimal use of limited resources under pressure from expanding populations
to maintain sustainable development.
As the European integration advances and the world goes digital there is
an increasing need for cross border and European geographic information at
all levels of society especially in digital form. The need is also broadening
to encompass much more information than just traditional map-data - such
as environmental data, business demographics, traffic information. At present
such digital information is scarce and hard to obtain. What does exist is
very national and/or application specific in scope. It does not fit easily
together with similar data from other Member States nor is it easily transferable
to other application areas. In addition there is a difficult transition from
the national/military scene to the tradable market, where one key issue is
open and fair access.
Geographic information is a complex, rapidly growing and important part of
the information society. New geographic information technologies are developing
rapidly. The great advantage is that it has the capability of summing up
and visualising graphically what vast amounts of data are trying to tell
you. There are many applications in international, national and local government,
business and research, and culture. Geographic information is important because
of its value for planning, land management, marketing studies, environment,
renewable energy resources, emergency services, health care, political analysis
and many other uses.
Unfortunately, future growth in Europe is hampered by major differences in
the way this unique type of information is collected, stored and distributed
in different countries and in different sectors of government and commerce.
Collecting and disseminating geographic information has been a specialised
activity organised by individual nations and professions in different ways
making it difficult to combine and exchange national data to create European
geographic information.
Geographic information content is also a growing part of multimedia content,
which is the key to growth and employment. At present the European content
market is worth 150 billion ECU and employs 2 million people. Over the next
10 years this sector is expected to generate 1 million new jobs. A proportion
of this will be related to the provision of geographic information.
Following nearly two years of wide ranging consultation among major geographic
information suppliers and users, a need has been established to formulate
a European policy framework for geographic information through which European
geographic information can be created, combined, marketed, used, reused and
shared in a cost effective manner for the benefit of the European information
society. It has the potential to provide better and more efficient government,
more efficient management of scarce resources and new business opportunities
for the nascent European geographic information industry.
The major impediments to the widespread and successful use of geographic
information in Europe are not technical, but political and organisational.
The lack of a European mandate on geographic information is retarding development
of joint geographic information strategies which causes unnecessary costs,
is stifling new goods and services and is reducing competitiveness.
What is required is a policy framework to set up and maintain a stable,
European-wide set of agreed rules, standards, procedures,
guidelines and incentives for creating, collecting, updating, exchanging,
accessing and using geographic information.
This policy framework must create a favourable business environment for
a competitive, plentiful, rich and differentiated supply of European
geographic information that is easily identifiable and easily
accessible.
The benefits include efficiencies of scale in a unified market, reduced problems
for cross border and pan-European projects, efficient technical solutions
for future growth, increasing use of European skills, improved market position
in geographic information and better results of European-wide planning and
decision making.
Europe has the means but needs to demonstrate the will to create
a policy framework for geographic information that will benefit the market
place and EU citizens. It must include the legal aspects of geographic
information to ensure the creation and use of EU-wide datasets and standards.
It must also stimulate and challenge private companies and public bodies
to invest in the creation of such datasets and to cooperate where appropriate.
The most important political actions needed are to achieve agreement between
the Member States:
- to set up a common approach to create European base data, and to make this
generally available at affordable rates. This must include the adoption of
the newest coordinate and projection systems on a Europe wide basis applicable
to European geographic information.
- to set up and adopt general data creation and exchange standards and to use
them.
- to improve the ways and means for both public and private agencies and
organisations to conduct European-level actions, such as creation of seamless
pan-European datasets.
- to ensure that European solutions are globally compatible.
- To initiate these actions, the Commission intends to create a GI2000 High
Level Working Party. It will involve representatives from all the leading
players in the public and private sectors including user representation and
be chaired by the Commission. The approach is the same as that adopted by
the Telecommunications Council of 27.11.96 to set up a working party to combat
illegal content on the Internet.
The Working Party will elaborate a detailed action plan to implement the
policy. Subsequently, it will provide the political leadership and vision
required to guide the implementation of the action plan. This communication
outlines a possible action plan on page 17.
The High Level Working Party will also provide the focal point for promoting
a sense of unity across disciplines and national borders.
The role of the Commission is to provide the European dimension to actions
at national level, acting as a catalyst, to coordinate Member States'
policies building on existing national information holdings and structures.
Neither new European organisational structures nor any form of central geographic
information data storage are proposed or envisioned. The basic collection
and storage of geographic information, creating and dissemination of metadata,
and performance of other basic actions, must remain national tasks. The
Commission will ensure coordination in regard to global geographic information
policy and projects, such as those proposed via the G7 and with regard to
the discussions being initiated at global level by the US Secretary of Interior.
In December 1993, the European Commission presented the European Council
in Brussels with the White Paper on "Growth, Competitiveness and Employment:
The Challenges and Ways Forward into the 21st Century".
(1) A critical element was the development of
the information society, especially within the triad of the European Union,
the United States and Japan. High-level, senior representatives from the
industries which would implement the information society met early in 1994
under the chairmanship of Commissioner Martin Bangemann and made
recommendations(2) which were presented to the European
Council at the Corfu summit in June 1994. These were later elaborated in
the Commission's action plan "Europe's Way to the Information Society"
(COM(94) 347 of 19.7.94) which is currently in the process of being
updated(3) The European Council in Essen in
December 1994 further underlined the importance of the emerging information
society on the role of new information services, and especially the
content, or the information itself. The G7 Ministerial Conference
in Brussels on 25-26 February 1995(4) confirmed
the opportunities the information society will offer and stressed the need
for global cooperation. Several of the projects defined at this summit involve
significant use of geographic information. This concerns especially the projects
on Environmental and Natural Resources management, Global Emergency Management
and Maritime Information Systems.
Recognising that geographic information is an important part of the information
society, French, German, Spanish and Dutch
ministers(5) urged the European Commission to
take a political initiative to further the creation of seamless, homogeneous,
digital data bases of geographic information for Europe and to increase support
to organisations such as EUROGI (6) and initiatives
such as MEGRIN(7) .
The issues and concerns raised by these ministers have been the focus of
a wide ranging series of consultation meetings with the main actors in the
European geographic information community, spanning the period December 1994
to June 1996, culminating in this Communication.
A community action in this area is fully in line with the principle of
subsidiarity as only the Community is in a position to coordinate Member
State action and take European initiatives to develop a European market for
European geographic information. Action to coordinate the establishment and
use of European geographic information will therefore strengthen interaction
and synergy between many different disciplines using geographic information.
Interdisciplinary synergy will be an important ingredient for the Fifth Framework
Programme for research and development.
The approach proposed is fully compatible with the new emerging priorities
for the Information Society and is also included in the Rolling Plan for
the Information Society. It contributes to favourable business environment
in which the private sector can exploit opportunities and prosper. Public
sector action is necessary in specific areas where the market fails. The
Herman report(8) calls on the Commission to
launch a debate on the future of public services of general interest and
of the production of public goods. The debate following this communication
will be one of the first to address this issue. This debate will also have
profound influence on the production of geographic information. People are
put at the centre as the approach focuses primarily on organising geographic
information in Europe rather than on technical issues. Clever processing
of geographic information leads to new insights about the physical and economic
world promoting the knowledge based society. Through its capabilities for
communicating information in an intuitive way geographic information can
involve citizens in the democratic decision process for all aspects touching
upon their daily lives. Creating and using geographic information applications
is a highly skilled activity. An increase in the use will also lead to a
corresponding increase in high quality employment.
After the fall of communism the countries of Central and Eastern Europe are
aspiring to become members of the EU. Regarding geographic information they
have had to re-create the information from scratch and are looking for guidance
from the EU in order to be compatible once they join.
Action is already being taken in the US. President Clinton issued Executive
Order on 11 April 1994 setting up the National Spatial Data Infrastructure,
under the guidance of US Secretary of Interior. One of the actions of the
order is to require all future geographic information collection, storage
and reporting to adhere to the standards of the Federal Geographic Data Committee
(FGDC).
2. Why Geographic Information is more important than ever before.
2.1.Geographic information defined
Geographic information is "information which can be related to a location
on the Earth, particularly information on natural phenomena, cultural and
human resources"(9) . In the past such information
has been expressed in the form of paper maps showing locations, boundaries
and relationships. Over the centuries maps have been very important in the
development of the nation state, as aids to territorial conquest, sovereignty
and defence, and for governing and managing territory in times of peace.
Maps are still a valuable tool for scientists, astronomers and explorers
to understand and control the natural world. But the term "geographic
information" also includes many other types of information which can be "related
to a location". Examples of geographic information are address data, market
research data, census data, postcodes, health data, data on environment and
natural resources, descriptions of transport and utility networks, information
on flows of goods, cadaster and land registration information and satellite
imagery. The time dimension is an important attribute of geographic information
because our world is constantly changing. Today, the information traditionally
held on maps, as well as other forms of geographic information, can be stored
in digital form, enabling it to be handled by computers. Geographic
information systems (GIS) enable different kinds of digital geographic
information to be linked, so users can extract and analyse geographic information
to support political, economic and scientific decision-making, for example,
for managing growth in less favoured areas, understanding the impact of set-aside
on agricultural production and rural ecology, or the interaction between
industrial activities and environment.
2.2. Why Geographic Information is important
This capability to relate different types of information on activities and
resources to a location enables changes over time to be monitored and predicted.
It is a fundamental capability for the effective management of
our complex modern society.
Geographic information is used in a wide range of applications, such as planning,
land management, asset management, marketing studies, business development,
environment, renewable energy resources, emergency services, health care,
political analysis, tourists's road maps and global studies on disease
control. Increasingly, geographic information applications in Europe are
providing essential information for management and decision making.
International, national, regional and local governments use geographic
information for a host of applications from defence and policing activities
through regional planning, strategic studies for renewable energy resources,
socio-economic, environmental management and risk avoidance. Day-to-day
operational activities include land registration, property taxation or routing
of traffic.
In social investigations, geographic information is used to help analyse
various attributes of the population such as income, crime, health or the
quality of housing for a given area.
Many services of the European Commission and other EU institutions
and agencies (e.g. EUROSTAT, the Joint Research Centre in Ispra, the European
Environmental Agency, etc.) are major users of geographic information.
Industry and commerce use geographic information in many ways. Utility
(power, gas, water, telephone and oil) companies are major investors in digital
geographic information technology for managing and monitoring their supply
networks, often on an international basis. Businesses use geographic information
together with other economic information to determine optimal delivery routes,
the location of potential markets or the site of outlets or factories.
Constructors of major infrastructure (roads, railways, bridges) use geographic
information to estimate the amounts and costs of material needed. In agriculture,
forestry, water resources or mining, geographic information is used to assess
yields and management strategies. In service industries, consultants draw
on geographic information to advise on business efficiency, or to provide
services for tourism and transport.
Geographic information is used for the analysis of a wide range of practical
environmental issues from global warming and sea-level rise to erosion,
flooding and soil, air and water pollution. Air and marine traffic control
as well as navigation both with and without satellite based GPS
(10) systems are also major application areas.Many
activities involving geographic information started before the digital age
and are enshrined in national or international law. Legally based land
registration is a crucial element in securing a prosperous and stable
society. For Western countries this is so obvious and self evident that we
tend to forget about it. It has become abundantly clear in the former communist
countries in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union where
the lack of proper land registration systems has stifled economic
development(11). As a consequence many support
projects from the West including the PHARE and TACIS programmes of the EU
are establishing such land registration systems to stimulate investment and
the economy.
2.3 The economic value of geographic information
It is possible to estimate the value of the traditional "geographic information
industry" and to make forecasts as to its growth over the coming years, although
such estimates vary widely depending upon a host of assumptions as to what
constitutes the "industry". Various market studies published by reputable
research firms, from 1993 to 1995, indicate that geographic information
represents a global market for both internal and external data collection
and conversion of 460 - 750 million ECU, with an annual growth rates of 15-20%.
Looking at the collection, provision and use of geographic information in
Europe as "economic activity" generated within a range of commercial, industrial
and governmental sectors, it is possible to justify estimated figures of
the order of 10 billion ECU. Several hundred thousand people, with high skill
levels, are employed. More detailed figures are being compiled in an EU study,
the results of which will be available in the beginning of 1997, as well
as in national studies being conducted by EU Member State mapping agencies
or associations.
Other aspects of the economic value of geographic information are hard to
quantify, but also important. What is the value of a life saved by using
geographic information in a civil protection system? What is the true economic
value to a food retailer of making the best decision on where to build the
next hyper-market in the chain?
Increasing use of geographic information can lead to many new products and
services which could have a major impact on the quality of life and
competitiveness of European industry as well as on the service level in the
public sector.
3. The opportunities - and challenges - for Europe
3.1.Key drivers
Two major forces are driving the development of geographic information at
an international level. The first is a growing need for governments and
businesses to carry out proper spatial analyses, many of which cross national
boundaries, and some of which are global in scope. The second is the ubiquitous
availability of cheap, powerful information and communications technology.
 Figure 1. Important cross border areas
Cross border and pan-European activities.
Important areas where geographic information technology is providing new
opportunities include critical cross border areas (see Figure 1) and pan-European
activities which require very different kinds of information to be brought
together. Critical cross border areas are those areas or regions which are
shared or affected by several countries, yet must be managed as a whole.
Pan-European activities include those most important for the European community
and internationally oriented business, commerce, research and education.
They include the setting up and use of geographic information databases and
products for major utility networks (oil, gas, water, electricity,
telecommunications), defence, transport, marketing, environment and resources
(geology, water, soil, renewable energy resources), health care and emergencies,
product development and training. Clearly, for these situations
it is essential to have shared geographic information of known
quality.
3.2. The effect of information technology on geographic information
Cheap, readily available computer power, with networking, powerful software
and digital databases, has democratised complex information processing in
geographic information. There has been a major change from the long, complex
process of data collection and representation required for conventional
map-making by professional cartographers to computer-generated maps which
can be tailor-made to specific requirements. Electronic technology empowers
all persons and create their own maps and data visualisations which they
will use to the extent of their abilities. A parallel can be drawn to the
advent of desk top publishing and Web technology which is providing publishing
capabilities to a mass market.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) permit all information traditionally
held on conventional paper maps to be handled and stored in digital form
and enable it to be linked to all other kinds of geographic information.
Users can extract and analyse geographic information to support political,
economic and scientific decision making, such as may be involved in managing
growth in less favoured areas, in understanding the impact of set-aside on
agricultural production and rural ecology or the interaction between industrial
activities and environment. Consequently, the range of persons and institutions
involved in collecting geographic information has exploded and there is a
growing market for digital topographic map data, satellite imagery, data
from censuses and market research studies, postcodes, health data, data on
environment and natural resources, transport networks and flows of goods,
cadaster and land registration, utility networks, statistics etc. as well
as for the means to analyse these datasets.
At the touch of a button, it is possible to retrieve and analyse geographic
information on any theme, for any area, at any desired level of resolution
provided one has the required data. Consequently, the variety of new geographic
information applications is constantly growing (see Table 1 on page
26). In contrast to conventional map-making,
many new applications deal with situations which vary both in time and space,
so fast computing and rapid updating and modification of databases are essential.
3.3.Existing situation and key players.
The range of people and institutions involved in collecting geographic
information has widened. There is a fast-growing market for digital geographic
data from many sources as well as for the technology to analyse these datasets.
The market is currently more developed in the northern countries but involvement,
awareness and use of geographic information in the southern Member States
is increasing. Commercial road network databases for vehicle navigation and
fleet management, produced by commercial companies, currently cover large
parts of Europe.
In Europe, geographic information is collected and disseminated by a range
of mandated national institutes such as national mapping agencies, military
organisations, cadastral administrations and geodetic surveys according to
a wide variety of national standards, and there are private companies that
publish a wide range of cartographic products. Conventionally, these
organisations produce paper maps at many scales. In some countries they are
freely available at a cost, while in others they may still be regarded as
military secrets. Increasingly, both public and private organisations are
providing geographic information in digital form to meet a wide range of
applications.
The collection and dissemination of much European geographic information
base data is currently controlled by governments through licensing and
copyrights, the details of which vary widely between the different Member
States. Many private companies also collect certain base data, as well as
much thematic data, especially relating to tourism and transport, and in
remote sensing. The market is currently more developed in the northern countries
but involvement, awareness and use of geographic information in the southern
Member States is increasing rapidly, as evidenced, for instance, by the May
1995 launch of Portugal's SNIG (Sistema Nacional de Informaçáo
Geográfica) network. Commercial road network databases for car navigation
and truck routing, produced by private companies, currently cover large parts
of Europe.
Steps have already been taken to move from purely national geographic information
initiatives to a more European approach in mapping, statistics, utilities,
environment and transport. In topographical mapping the European National
Mapping Agencies (NMA) created CERCO (Comité Européen des
Responsables de la Cartographie Officielle) composed of the head of mapping
agencies from 32 countries) in 1980 for exchanging practical experience.
In 1993 CERCO created the MEGRIN GIE (Multipurpose European Ground Related
Information Network - Groupement d'Intérêt Economique under
French law) in which mapping agencies from 17 countries participate. Its
purpose is to develop closer cooperation in order to be better prepared for
providing EU-wide cartographic data.
In addition, many kinds of thematic data are collected by international,
national and private agencies: geological surveys, soil surveys, space agencies,
demographic studies, censuses, motoring and transport associations, etc.
Owners of airborne or space remote sensing platforms have provided data in
both photographic and digital form.
Many private companies collect and disseminate digital geographic information,
often in the form of added value information products not provided by national
mapping agencies. Several commercial organisations, in the form of vendors
of technology or data suppliers, have already played major roles in creating
European-wide datasets or in providing European-wide technical support for
geographic information. At the commercial level, several alliances have been
formed between both large corporations and SMEs (small and medium enterprises),
in different business sectors, in order to collect and integrate various
types of geographic information, especially in the areas of transport and
tourism.
At the research level, the European Science Foundation has supported the
GISDATA programme to stimulate international research in geographic
information(12) . GISIG
(13) is a sector specific UETP financed under
the COMETT programme to further international training and cooperation in
geographic information between industry and universities.
In 1994, with support from the EU IMPACT programme, the European Umbrella
Organisation for Geographic Information (EUROGI) was formed to bring together
national and European organisations for geographic information that cover
fields wider than those addressed by CERCO and MEGRIN. Today 16 countries
and 7 European organisations are members, or are in the process of joining,
and more new members are expected. It has stimulated discussion on geographic
information policies at the European level and has been instrumental in
catalysing national geographic information activities in several countries.
EUROGI and its members represent geographic information practitioners through
national and European geographic information associations and it is well
placed to initiate practical consultations on implementing the policy framework.
In a COST 326 action projects for Maritime Information Systems are being
developed using geographic information as are some of the G7 projects. On
the marine side also the International Hydrographic Office in Monaco is a
key player.From the space sector remote sensing earth observation data is
being captures by ever more sophisticated instrumentation paying no respect
for national borders. Such thematic data is becoming increasingly important
for many applications and it has a potential eventually to have a significant
impact on the market for geographic information. The organisations involved
in capturing, processing and disseminating this data are important actors.
The Centre for Earth Observation (CEO) programme, and EU initiative in the
space sector coordinated by the Joint Research Centre in Ispra and DG XII,
has been set up to increase the dissemination of space acquired data. The
CEO is now in its implementation phase lasting until 1998. The CEO project
is compatible and complementary with the policy framework as described here.
A number of actions are already being undertaken towards the creation of
metadata for earth observation data.
3.4.Europe has many strengths in geographicinformation.
European strengths in relation to the information market include a wide cultural
diversity and much experience in establishing the structures needed to overcome
the difficulties inherent in using multiple languages and working within
differing technical, legal, social and political systems.
There are very good national topographic data making Europe one of
the best mapped regions of the world - but fragmented at national level.
Very good national thematic geographic information datasets exist,
e.g. in the fields of environment, property rights (land registries), traffic
logistics, demography, employment, soils, hydrology and geology. There are
very high resolution satellites (SPOT(14) and
ERS (15) and accompanying expertise in remote
sensing. There is a well-organised industry with a highly skilled work force
and many professional associations. Actions for improving and setting up
standards for geographic information data description and exchange are ongoing
in the CEN TC 287 (16) and ISO TC 211
(17) committees the latter with strong European
participation.
Though new geographic information technologies and applications are developing
rapidly, future growth in Europe is hampered by major differences in the
way geographic information is collected, stored and distributed in the different
countries and in different sectors of government and commerce. Although some
national markets are well advanced the European market for geographic information
has developed slowly and with great difficulty. A dynamic internal market
for geographic information does not exist at present in Europe. The existing
activities - all very laudable individually - are fragmented and poorly
coordinated at European level. EUROGI has still not reached its critical
mass to have a major impact and it is still lacking in legitimacy.
Traditionally, geographic information has been a specialised activity organised
by individual nation states and professions in different ways. European standards
for data definition and exchange are only now emerging, but are complex to
use. Provision for basic European geographic information, data sets. supporting
technology and knowledge infrastructure has not been well coordinated across
disciplines or national boundaries making it difficult and expensive to fit
data together from many different sources in a seamless way.
Increasingly, geographic information applications in Europe, in national
and local government, in industry and commerce and in research, are providing
essential information for management and decision making. However, many projects
encounter unnecessary difficulties because of problems of data availability,
exchangeability, and compatibility. Building a comprehensive database is
expensive and time consuming(18) and
incompatibility in data may discourage important
developments(19). Recent estimates based on
a market survey of 1000 geographic information users
(20) suggest that on average, the costs of
data conversion are at least double the costs of externally acquired data!
This wasteful overhead is especially acute in Europe because Europe does
not yet have a European policy framework for geographic information, though
certain organisations such as CERCO and EUROGI have been working to these
ends. The primary goal of such a European policy framework for geographic
information should be to eliminate the barriers to wider use caused by lack
of agreement between nations, disciplines, software vendors, data collectors
and users on a range of issues, from the purely technical (such as standards
and interoperability) to the legal (copyright, liability) to market related
(pricing policy, public/private synergy).
The problems are political and organisational rather than technical. Historical
problems in the European geographic information industry include fragmented
markets, often governed by differing regulatory systems, and insufficient
market size at national level to achieve substantial economies of scale and
scope.
The research effort in geographic information is generally dispersed both
in national and European programmes. Many projects use or develop geographic
information technologies but there is no overall strategy and little coherence
in these efforts.
There are few coherent European-wide, or even regional, applications and
data sets, except those that have been specifically built for commercial
road navigation projects. Most national agencies (whether mapping agencies,
statistical institutes or environmental agencies) have no mandate to provide
for the cost of collecting and maintaining EU-wide data sets. Few countries
have a single mandated point of contact or central authority with overall
responsibility for geographic information, even at national level and, if
they do, the strengths of the mandates are unequal. International governmental
data sets are usually small scale that have arisen primarily from requirements
for the European Union to look at wider pan-European policy issues (e.g.
the CORINE (21)European Land Cover data).
It is likely that in the future, ventures at regional level will need to
set up cross-border regional systems to handle geographic information.
The commercial road navigation data include road centre lines for the whole
of Europe at 1:10 000 and a growing list of related attributes, but these
lack many details and attributes considered essential by users of geographic
information in sectors outside road navigation and marketing. Integration
of these different data has yet to be achieved.
The data that does exist is hard to find and poorly documented. It is generally
not collected following common standards which would permit the data to be
useful in different applications.
Although there are good software companies in Europe specialising in geographic
information, especially in regard to object oriented technology, most geographic
information software in general use is provided from the USA. European suppliers
command approximately 20 % of the European market, estimated at 800 MECU.
This market share is obtained mainly in the home countries of the vendors
through national champions. The European suppliers's world wide market
share is 5% of 3.1 billion ECU. While such imported technology has generated
support services and employment and created awareness of geographic information
developments elsewhere, many European suppliers feel disadvantaged and
threatened(22). There is a clear need to strengthen
European geographic information industry and to give it a sense of community
and identity at European level. This will also strengthen Europe's position
globally.
In addition to the more technical reasons given above the development of
European geographic information is still hampered because people still think
and act nationally in many respects
This fragmented development history of geographic information in Europe
has resulted in quite disparate market development across the Member
States. To reap the full benefits of the internal market a European
policy framework in the area of geographic information is urgently
needed now to develop the European market for geographic information.
4. A strategy to remove bottlenecks and grasp opportunities.
There is a discernible trend towards ad hoc harmonisation of geographic
information in Europe, via the work of CERCO, EUROGI and CEN, as well as
from joint projects in industry and business and the activities of pan-European
geographic information vendor and user associations. However, progress is
being hampered by political and institutional considerations that need to
be addressed at the highest levels if the opportunities provided by geographic
information technology are to be fully exploited. To remove bottlenecks,
reduce unnecessary costs and provide new market opportunities, a coherent
European policy framework is needed in which the industry and market can
prosper.
What is required is a policy framework to set up and
maintain a stable, European-wide set of agreed rules,
standards, procedures, guidelines and incentives for creating, collecting,
exchanging and using geographic information.
This policy framework must create a favourable business environment for
a competitive, plentiful, rich and differentiated supply of European
geographic information that is easily identifiable and easily accessible
so that
- every market niche is open to every entrepreneur on fair competitive terms,
and
- existing data can be combined effectively and easily and new data added to
provide new insights about the physical and economic world for the benefit
of the citizen, society and the economy.
The policy framework must address the technical, organisational and political
issues of lowering the cost of collecting, disseminating and using geographic
information throughout Europe. It must encompass all aspects of European
geographic information - its collection, storage, maintenance, dissemination,
integration, harmonisation, use and possible misuse, by and for the largest
possible market in Europe, both private and public sector.
- A mandate from the Council needs to be established because national
geographic information institutes and other geographic information collectors
do not have supranational mandates.
- Activities under the policy framework should be organised by a High
Level Working Party that is completely in touch with the EU, with geographic
information institutes and policy makers in the Member States, with private
industry and with the market place.
- The actions would mainly be implemented by European, national and
industrial geographic information producers and users.
- The policy should take account of similar initiatives in other parts of the
world and ensure European contribution to initiatives of global harmonisation
of geographic information.
The lack of a basic European policy framework geographic information is hampering
developments has been demonstrated in practice by several of the projects
supported by the Community in the IMPACT and INFO2000 programmes. The projects
encountered difficulties in getting access to the data required at a reasonable
price and many good project ideas could not be effectively exploited. Under
INFO2000 projects are being supported that will start to build an initial
framework relating to the availability of base data and metadata and acquire
practical experiences in this task. These efforts are highly necessary but
far from sufficient.
4.1.Elements which already exist.
The concepts behind the policy framework have existing precursors. Initiatives
have been taken in other countries, some European, some in North America
where policy actions are being defined and implemented. In several EEA Member
States the preliminary discussions prior to this communication have had an
effect in accelerating the development of national policies. As a result
there is an ever-growing collection of national digital geographic information
datasets held by local, regional, national and pan-European data providers
and users, both public and private. Such databases need not be physically
interlinked, as long as potential users of geographic information know
what databases exist, where they are located, who "owns"
them, and how they can be accessed and purchased. These questions
are answered by establishing metadata (23)
information services across Europe. The development of agreed format for
geographic information metadata and adoption of this format by European
geographic information vendors and users is an important prerequisite for
further progress.
Other less visible, less tangible, but equally important aspects include
continued support for European associations such as EUROGI and actions to
increase the strengths mentioned above; more R&D work to maintain
Europe's position in geographic information innovations both in national
and European research programmes such as the 4th and 5th Framework Programmes
and GISDATA (24) ; actions to increase awareness
of geographic information and its myriad uses; geographic information skills
development and training; and not least, the growing awareness of the need
for policies at Member State level to help ensure the widest possible market
for geographic information, in the private and public sectors. These actions
are, however, very limited in size and uncoordinated both on a national and
on a European level.
4.2.The main practical objectives for
the policy framework are:
1. To provide, at the European level, an open and flexible, framework for
organising the provision, distribution and standardisation of geographic
information for the benefit of all suppliers and users, both public and private.
2 To achieve European-wide metadata dissemination, through appropriate
information exchanges that conform to accepted world-wide practices.
3. To stimulate the convergence of national geographic information policies
and to learn from experience at national level to ensure that EU-wide objectives
can be met as well, at little additional cost and without further delay or
waste of prior work already completed.
4. To lay the foundations for rapid growth in the marketplace by supporting
the initiatives and structures needed to guarantee ready access to the wealth
of geographic information that already exists in Europe, and to ensure that
major tasks in data capture are cost effective, resulting in products and
services usable at national and pan-European scales.
5. To develop policies which aid European businesses in effective and efficient
development of their home markets in a wide range of sectors by encouraging
informed and innovative use of geographic information in all its many forms,
and promoting new and sophisticated analysis, visualisation and presentation
tools (including the relevant datasets) which can be used by non-experts.
6. To help realise the business opportunities for the European geographic
information industry in a global and competitive marketplace.
7. To position Europe in a global context.
4.3. Expected Benefits
Achieving these practical objectives will lead to improving the basis for
decision making at European institutions and in private and public organisations
at national level. Organisations will be able to choose more effective policies
to meet the challenges of the information society and the globalisation of
the economy through access to relevant geographic information datasets and
tools. This will lead to private organisations becoming more competitive,
more profitable, producing higher quality products and giving better service.
Similarly, public sector organisations could provide better services to the
citizen in a wide range of functions, from better traffic control and more
effective emergency services to health and environmental monitoring or urban
and rural planning. Greater use of quality geographic information will improve
understanding and the quality of management of the total European living
space, including environmental, socio-economic, legal, health, employment
and other aspects of life.
Particular benefits to be expected from a coherent European policy for geographic
information are:
- efficiencies of scale in a unified market, reducing development and
conversion costs
- more effective cross-border and pan-European projects, realised sooner
- efficient technical solutions for future growth
- improved European position in European and global markets
- better planning and decision-making Europe-wide
With this communication the Commission wishes to launch a debate about the
problems and issues at stake regarding geographic information at European
level. The actions outlines below should therefore not be seen as the components
of a ready made action plan. Rather they constitute a catalogue of potential
actions that the Commission would consider appropriate and which are put
forward to stimulate the debate.
Improved European cooperation and coordination
To avoid duplication of work and to stimulate interdisciplinary synergy,
coordination is required at European level, between Member States policies,
at EU level and between the actors in the marketplace. Even within the Commission
stronger coordination is called for.
Everyone recognises the need for improved coordination but at the same time
few are willing to be coordinated. This dilemma can only be overcome
through the development of a common goals that everyone can subscribe to
and to guide their implementation through strong visionary leadership at
high political level.
To provide this leadership the Commission intends to establish a GI2000 High
Level Working Party. It will involve representatives from all the leading
players in the public and private sectors including user representation and
be chaired by the Commission. The approach is the same as that adopted by
the Telecommunications Council of 27.9.96 to set up a working party to combat
illegal content on the Internet.
- The Working Party will act as a European focal point for geographic information
and be a platform for exchange of information to stimulate cooperation and
synergies between the key players in Member States, industry, amongst the
users and within the Commission(25) ,.
- provide the leadership required for implementing joint actions,
- define more detailed action plans and policies for the years to come, including
consensus building and proposals for converging national policies,
- provide guidance for the implementation of geographic information related
actions in the 5th Framework Programme.
Stimulate the creation of base data
The single most important barrier to the development of the market for geographic
information is the lack of seamless European base data. Expressed in a simple
manner, base data is the data needed by most applications. What base data
exactly encompasses will be discussed and defined in close collaboration
with the market actors. Effort should first be devoted to producing base
data where it does not yet exist. A large part of the topological data produced,
inter alia, by the National Mapping Agencies, is base data. However, also
other data types such as address data and other data having a linkage function
between objects and a position on the earth could qualify as base data.
The guiding principle is that European base data should be created by market
actors in fair competition preferably through cooperative ventures between
the public and private sectors. The role of the EU is to stimulate the national
organisations to cooperate more closely and to encourage greater participation
by the private sector in collecting base data, acting as an honest broker.
No single actor or group of actors is likely to be the sole
provider of a certain kind of base data.
In this context the Commission is a customer of geographic information for
its own purposes of managing the various EU policies such as agricultural
policy, transport policy regional policy etc. Pull from these policies will
act as a strong market force encouraging the creation of some pan-European
base data sets in accordance with normal public procurement rules. This is
to be encouraged, as the availability of such data sets can bring benefit
to other applications.
Developing base data will involve supporting stronger cooperation between
Member State agencies (NMAs, National Statistical Institutes, census bureaux,
environmental agencies, river and coastal authorities, etc.) as well as private
industry for creating geographic base data which are seamless across Europe.
This is probably the area where political leadership and vision is most required.
It will be necessary to examine the functioning of the market for example
by research, review and examination of the effects on the development of
the geographic information market of pricing criteria adopted by national
agencies and private data suppliers.
Stimulate the creation of metadata services
The purpose of metadata is to improve the possibilities for locating existing
information and for sharing such information across different applications.
Apart from the absence of European base data, there is a general lack of
awareness of the mainly national data that does exist. This includes lack
of information on the commercial conditions of usage of such data as well
as information on its scope and quality.
Metadata means data about data. It is proposed to stimulate the creation
of EU-wide metadata services offering information about existing geographic
information datasets. Commercially oriented organisations interested in selling
data should be interested in providing feed for such services or maybe even
for setting up and running such services although initial studies indicate
that there is a weak business case for such services. There may therefore
well be a case for public sector intervention as this appears to be an area
where the market fails.
A European metadata standard is currently under development, but there is
a need to encourage or even oblige data producers to document the data they
possess in a standardised way and to ensure that this documentation is widely
available and cheaply accessible, preferably in electronic form. It is important
that any final standard is suitable for all types of geographic information,
not just topographic data.
The EU contribution would be to stimulate the creation of EU-wide services
that combine individual or national services into truly European services
through appropriate networking. Common interconnection rules and standards
need to be established and ways of creating single entry points to such services
need to be defined.
Lowering legal barriers and reducing potential risks
Geographic information, like other types of information, is affected by legal
rules covering copyright, data protection, personal privacy, liability for
misuse and non-benign use of information. However, because of its nature,
the problems are heavily accentuated. Nevertheless there does not seem at
this stage to be a need for specific action for geographic information other
than one of involvement of the key players when legal issues pertaining to
the information market in general are being discussed or implemented at European
level.
The Commission intends to involve the actors and keep them informed through
the High Level Working Party mentioned above.
The green paper on access to public sector information elaborated in the
context of the INFO2000 programme will be published shortly. The debate that
will follow will be a good occasion to involve the geographic information
key players in this important issue which also has profound implications
for the market for geographic information.
B. Specific Actions
Stimulating Public/Private synergy
Encourage the creation of public/private partnerships so that the wealth
of public sector geographic information can be better exploited by the private
sector for use in new and useful business and public sector applications.
This is not only applicable to base data as described above, but to any type
of thematic or application data. The private sector can add value to public
sector data and thus expand the market. In addition business to business
alliances should be encouraged.
Devising methods to stimulate suitable partnerships and alliances will be
one of the practical tasks of the High Level Working Party.
Market Stimulation
The development of a market for geographic information is based on a underlying
technologically oriented industry. This comprises manufactures of hardware
including terrestrial and space borne instrumentation for data capture ,
developers of data management and analysis software and an associated services
and systems integration industry. Any one of these can develop only if the
others are healthy. The policy framework must create favourable conditions
for entrepreneurial initiative and technological innovation to thrive in
this area.
It is proposed to stimulate the market with better information particularly
with respect to financing schemes resulting in better use of existing EU,
national and private financial instruments as opposed to proving traditional
public subvention. This approach may prove to be more dynamic, and in accordance
with the needs of industry as it does not relieve companies of their commercial
responsibilities. In the face of severe budgetary restrictions, this model
is certainly more economic and less demanding on public spending. Existing
EU wide networks such as the MIDAS network under the INFO2000 programme could
be tasked with providing this kind of information.
Research and Development.
It is suggested that the existing efforts regarding geographic information
and geographic information systems in the Communities R&D programmes
should be clustered under the 5th Framework Programme, ensuring better
exploitation of synergy, concertation and reflection of users' and industry's
needs. This will be an improvement to the present situation where projects
pertaining to geographic information are scattered throughout the programmes
with little or no interaction between them. Encouragement to, and integration
with, other European efforts such as the GISDATA programme funded by the
European Science Foundation, the COST 326 framework for developing maritime
electronic navigational charts and new EUREKA projects, should also be sought.
Components of a coordinated approach to geographic information R&D would
include the development of new algorithms and modelling techniques involving
advanced spatial and temporal analysis procedures and integration with new
visualisation methodologies, such as virtual reality.
The approach developed under the 4th Framework Programme for research and
industry task forces will be applied in the area of geographic information.
Standards, Interoperability and Quality.
This action will support the development of geographic information standards
both at European and world level.
Work on standards in geographic information is already underway under CEN,
but needs to be reinforced, particularly by validating the newly developed
standards in practical projects. Stronger information flow is needed to users
about how to implement the standards, as well as positive encouragement to
do so. The return flow of information back into the standardisation process
from users regarding their present and future needs is currently lacking
altogether.
It will be important for Europe to dispose of common reference and projection
systems for geographic information. This is an area that the High Level Working
Party will examine with priority to arrive at a consensus.
Finally a plurality and differentiation of products at different quality
levels and prices are needed to encourage a thriving market in data. Therefore
it is necessary to develop quality metrics and quality metadata facilitating
the comparison between competing products. These metrics might include
descriptors for precision, reliability and consistency for the data and service
levels for data providers.
The initiative for these actions will be taken by the Commission in consultation
with the High Level Working Party. The practical work should be done mainly
by the European standardisation organisations CEN, CENELEC (electrotechnical
standards) and ETSI (telecommunications standards) as appropriate together
with the interested market actors. European standards should be funded jointly
by key players and the EU to ensure that they correspond closely to the needs
of users.
Awareness, Education and training
The purpose will be to increase the awareness of information providers and
potential users of geographic information of the benefits of understanding
the spatial aspects of their data, and the need to have certain skills. Awareness
actions must be aimed at new and existing users as well as decision makers.
Education and training programmes should be developed under existing national
and EU training initiatives, such as SOCRATES and LEONARDO, aimed at decision
makers at all levels, as well as support to the development of geographic
information professions in the EU. This goes beyond surveying into new
professions specialising in spatial combination and visualisation of data.
It is proposed that basic knowledge about geographic information is taught
in secondary school and that no one leaves university with a technically
oriented degree without having been exposed to basic geographic information
analysis and visualisation techniques.
Under the INFO2000 programme an action is being launched for the development
of a masters degree in information engineering. This will include a number
of modules pertaining to designing and exploiting geographic information.
Improving our understanding of the market
Actions and resources are needed to be able to monitor and analyse the geographic
information market. Resources are needed to collect, analyse and disseminate
this information in order to assist the Commission to help it define, refine
and monitor policy, but also as an impartial information source for market
actors.
Defining Global Rules
By organising geographic information at European scale, the Union can far
better contribute to and influence the discussion about global rules for
sharing and inter-operation of geographic information. The purpose is to
analyse global issues relevant to all mankind such as the evolution of global
weather, preservation of rain forest, agriculture, radioactive contamination
etc. Global policies in these areas can only be meaningfully debated and
developed when the appropriate information is compatible and circulates at
global level. Contacts for greater information sharing at global level have
already been initiated between the US Secretary of Interior and Commissioner
Bangemann.
The G7 projects which involve significant use of geographic information must
be followed closely to ensure that developments therein are compatible with
the emerging European policy framework and that there is a flow of information
between the projects and the High Level Task Force for mutual benefit. As
previously mentioned this especially concerns the projects on Environmental
and Natural Resources management, Global Emergency Management and Maritime
Information Systems.
ISO(26) work in geographic information has just started.
Committees have been established with strong European participation ensuring
that international standards will be strongly influenced by the European
approach. This demonstrates clearly that only a single European voice is
one that will be heard. This work needs full support of the European geographic
information community to ensure that this marginal European advantage is
maintained and preferably expanded for the benefit of European industry.
Conclusion
The major impediments to the widespread and successful use of geographic
information in Europe are not technical, but political and organisational.
The development of new goods and services is being stifled by the high costs
of data acquisition, conversion and dissemination. As a result, European
success in the global geographic information market is threatened.
A European policy for geographic information will address the need for political
and organisational co-ordination and provide a fertile environment for technical
development. It will contribute to providing better and more efficient
government, more effective management of scarce resources, and new business
opportunities, and ensure important European cross-border initiatives are
nurtured and managed cost-effectively.
The concept of a European geographic information policy is gathering support
via a wide consultation process amongst the major actors, initiated by the
Commission. The approach is compatible with the etirging priorities for the
Information Society and in line with the principle of subsidiarity, as only
the Community is in a position to take initiatives to develop a European
market for geographic information.
The Member States are invited to cooperate with the Commission to provide
the political support and visionary leadership both at national and European
level to achieve the goals set out in this Communication and to commit the
resources necessary.
Europe must act now or miss out.
Appendix Geographic information - technical description
To understand the importance of geographic information, and the difficulty
in collecting, comparing, or even sharing geographic information, it is necessary
to understand the phrase "related to a location" in the definition: Geographic
information is "information which can be related to a location on the Earth,
particularly information on natural phenomena, cultural and human
resources"(27) .
Geographic information is created by adding a spatial attribute to many other
types of information, e.g. "my house" or "my name" or "the chemical factory
XYZ" (various types of information) is located at "123 Avenue du Bois" or
"in commune ABC" or "ten km north of Gare Centrale in city W" (all valid
locations). Thus the relation can be a specific set of co-ordinates, or can
cover less precise locations or areas, such as addresses, postal codes or
administrative boundaries, regions or even whole countries. Most geographic
information also includes a time dimension, since the world is not a static
place.
To be of further use for analytical purposes planning, taxation etc., these
locations must also be expressed in such a way as to permit physical comparisons
of data from different locations. This is accomplished by creating co-ordinate
systems, whether used for map referencing at national level, or for marine,
air or even celestial navigation. Now, location "123 Ave. du Bois" can be
assigned a specific, physical location in the target co-ordinate system and
any information attached to this location can be viewed, analysed or compared
in relation to other locations in the vicinity, and the information attached
to those locations. This ability to attach a multitude of different types
of information to both "logical" locations (e.g. an address) and physical
representations of those locations (e.g. specific map co-ordinates) is what
makes geographic information so useful.
Geographic information is used in a wide range of applications, from
tourists's road maps to global studies on disease control. It can be
divided into two major classes: base data (sometimes called core data or
framework data), which are necessary for most applications, and
application-specific data, often referred to as thematic data.
Base data may include basic co-ordinates
(28) for determining geographic locations;
elevation data used to describe terrain; data on the location of natural
objects, such as rivers, coasts and lakes, and major features such as roads,
railways, towns and cities; administrative boundaries at national, regional
and local levels (e.g. NUTS(29) boundaries and post-code
districts); and linkage data (e.g. relating addresses to co-ordinate systems).
The key factor for deciding what is or is not "base data" is how often it
is needed or used in a wide range of applications across many disciplines,
as opposed to a specific application.
Application-specific data covers all other kinds of geographic information
that may be used in one application but not in all. Examples include
socio-economic data from planning studies and censuses and natural resource
data such as soil information or ground water quality, or special purpose
versions of the base data (e.g. the use of road centre lines for auto
navigation). Application specific data are largely thematic and may range
from measures of reflected radiation captured by remote sensing sensors to
data on utility networks to information about land ownership, land use and
natural resources, or demography and health.
In Europe, base data are collected and disseminated by a range of mandated
national institutes such as National Mapping Agencies, Military Organisations,
Cadastral and Geodetic Surveys according to a wide variety of national standards,
and there are private companies that publish a wide range of cartographic
products. Conventionally, these organisations produce paper maps at a wide
range of scales, which in some countries are freely available at a cost,
while in others they may still be regarded as military secrets. In addition,
many kinds of thematic data are collected by international, national and
private agencies.
Increasingly, both public and private organisations are providing geographic
information in digital form to meet a wide range of applications. By means
of computerised GIS digital data can be exchanged, used, modified and combined
with other spatial and non-spatial data in an unlimited number of ways yielding
new insights. However, such exchange, conversion and integration is not always
a straightforward activity. Identifying ways and means to better re-use existing
geographic information data is also important and will lead to increased
market size by permitting new information products and services to be created
at lower cost.
Table 1. Examples of new geographic information
products and services Business - Spatial Decision support systems
for industry: Where to locate an industry, how to manage environmental issues,
how to manage emergency in case of heavy polluting accident. GIS brings tools
to manage those problems; GIS enables to combine various data types and extract
relevant data to help investment decision process.- Real Estate analyses
Public service - Spatial decision support for public services: land-use
management, location of health care facilities, optimisation and control
of Emergency Services, road pricing and traffic monitoring as function of
traffic density (city traffic management system).- The analysis of the
distribution of crime by the police- Results of epidemiological analyses
can be significantly improved by using GIS. Transport and tourism
- In-car real time navigation (Advance Transport Telematics)- Tourism -
optimising and allocation of resources.- New database systems designed to
cope with complex data: the GIS is able to combine and analyse complex data
and extract relevant information which otherwise would be difficult or expensive
to obtain (e.g. weather forecasting models, hydrological models, ...)-
Portable office with linked laptop, GPS receiver and cellular phone, will
enable real time positioning and tracking of vehicles e.g. to optimise goods
delivery, to reduce costs and environmental impact.- Marine and river navigation,
air transport optimisation- Personalised navigation systems for the blind
Agriculture - Real time yield recording systems in combine harvesters-
Systems for adjusting fertiliser applications to soil fertility- Crop yield
monitoring, modelling, policy and set aside. Visualisation and
cartography - Multimedia systems for visual planning and enhancing value
of conventional databases are providing "visual GIS" for a host of applications
ranging from real estate through street planning to landscape architecture
and environmental clean-up.- Digital data collection tools : e.g. GPS makes
mapping operations easier and faster; Environmental protection and natural
resource management - On-line monitoring systems for natural hazards,
real-time modelling and consequences analysis (landslides, eruptions,
earthquakes, flooding, forest fires, hurricanes).- Energy collectors from
wind, sun and tides: Implementation of these collectors require a very deep
knowledge of the environment, first to optimise their efficiency, secondly
to reduce their impact on the environment, GIS tools are essential for both.
- Design packages for energy efficient local and design of buildings:
micro-climatic studies enable better planning of housing and building design,
in order to improve energy efficiency.- Automated samplers for pollutants
in soil, water and air- Environmentally sensitive extraction of natural resources
, modelling sources of renewable energy resources- Managing fish stocks needs
combination of various geographical information to determine potential place,
monitor water quality and fish movements.
(1)
White
Paper on "Growth, Competitiveness and Employment:) The Challenges and
Ways Forward into the 21st Century", Supplement 6/93, Bulletin of the European
Communities, ISBN 92-826-7000-7, available from the Office for Official
Publications of the European Communities, L-2985, Luxembourg.
(2) Europe and the Global Information Society: Recommendations
to the European Council, 26 May 1994.
(3) The implications of the information society for EU policies
- Preparing the next steps - COM(96)395 24.7.96
(4) The G7 comprises Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan,
UK and the USA.
(5) The French Minister for Equipment, Transport and Tourism,
M. Bosson, in a letter to President Delors, suggested that the EU provide
a stronger political impetus to geographic information at the European level
to further the creation of seamless homogeneous digital maps of Europe. He
also referred to activities in the United States relating to the establishment
and development of the National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) and the
positive influence of US President Clinton's Executive Order of 11 April
1994, which set the whole process in motion. Subsequently, Commissioner Bangemann
received letters from Mr Rexrodt, German Minister of Economics, and from
Mr Borell, Spanish Minister of Public Works, Transport and Environment, both
urging a stronger political initiative from the European Commission and
increasing support to EUROGI to help develop the market.
(6) European Umbrella Organisation for Geographic Information,
an independent pan-European "association of associations" created in 1994
under an initiative of the IMPACT programme of DG XIII/E.
(7) MEGRIN - "Multipurpose European Ground Related Information
Network" set up by CERCO ( Comité Européen des Responsables
de la Cartographie Officielle ) in 1993.
(8) Resolution of the European Parliament of 19.9.96 - no
A4-0244/96 on the Commissions action plan for the information society (COM(94)347
- C4-0093/94)
(9) GIS Dictionary" - A Standards Committee Publication
of the Association for Geographic Information (AGI), UK, Version no. 1.1,
STA/06/91, published January 1991.
(10) Global Positioning System. A system of US defence
satellites for military and civil navigation
(11) Hernando de Soto (Peruvian entrepreneur and economist),
"The Missing Ingredient", Economist , 11 September 1993.
(12) The European Science Foundation GISDATA research programme
was set up in 1992 and involves collaboration between university and government
research organisations in all European countries.
(13) GISIG (Geographical Information Systems International
Group is a European-wide consortium of GI groups in universities and industry,
direct from Genoa and originally set up under the COMETT programme. It is
promoted by the Genova Richerche Consortium.
(14) Satellite pour l'observation de la Terre
(15) European Remote Sensing Satellite from the European
Space Agency (ESA)
(16) CEN, the European Committee on Standards, set up its
Technical Committee TC 287 with the aim of creating the standards required
in the field of geographic information. Within its further technical committee,
TC 278, the topic of geographic information data standards for road, transport
and traffic telematics purposes is also addressed.
(17) ISO also set up two technical committees, ISO TC 211
for geographic information and ISO TC 204 for road telematics.
(18) Fabrizio Jemma , letter to GISDATA and GISIG members
from Eurimage , 28 July 1995
(19) "The Basic Geographic Information of the Baltic Drainage
Basin", National Board of Waters and the Environment, Helsinki 1994. ISBN
951-47-9696-9.
(20) Petra Gartzen, Dataquest Europe Ltd., from study on
GI in Europe.
(21) Commission work programme concerning an experimental
project for gathering, coordinating and ensuring the consistency of information
on the state of the environment and natural resources in the Community,
1985-1990. Now this programme has been taken over by the European Environment
Agency.
(22) There is also a danger that larger foreign competitors
will simply "buy up" their European competitors, as in the case of
Microsoft's take-over of NextBase Ltd (UK) in 1995.
(23) Metadata is defined as data which describes the
characteristics of a data set such as content and quality, and provides details
on points of contact to view or to acquire the data.
(24) The European Science Foundation GISDATA research programme
was set up in 1992 and involves collaboration between university and government
research organisations in all European countries.
It is important that this cooperation includes Switzerland
to avoid an important geographical "hole" in Europe as well as the countries
of Central and Eastern Europe already prior to EU membership
(26) ISO also set up two technical committees, ISO TC 211
for geographic information and ISO TC 204 for road telematics.
(27) "GIS Dictionary" - A Standards Committee Publication
of the Association for Geographic Information (AGI), UK, Version no. 1.1,
STA/06/91, published January 1991".
(28) also knows as geodetic frameworks or reference systems
(29) Nomenclature des Unités Territoriales Statistiques
defined and used by EUROSTAT
|